I came to the U.S., not because I was wowed by the complexity of the discourse around race (I was too ignorant of its nuances for that), but because a discourse existed, or so I’d read. And just the idea that people would talk about it would mean that I could remove my very British gag order and maybe piece together enough of a lexicon to eventually say my piece.
I learned. And I rebelled - tamely. Mainly by writing impassioned response papers which diagnosed various scholars as blinkered. Either for sealing off African-American experience from a wider diasporic community or for using theory derived from Af-Am experience to understand black people everywhere. Called on in seminars I’d sometimes expound on class in Britain and Jamaica or ethnicity in Brazil. Mainly I lacked the language, waved my hands vaguely: “It’s just different”.
Part of a recent conversation with a history teacher at a NY public high school:
Me: But the U.S. is insular - it’s so big! But also insular in the way global powers think they can afford to be …
Her: It’s funny I have students writing about apartheid right now. More than half of them have turned in their papers with stuff like “African Americans were persecuted by the Apartheid government” or “the black minorities had to work in the mines”
I laugh and I’m horrified. But what did I know at that age? (actually, I did know that but only because two years of all-black church-based Saturday school will hammer it home). In their defense, these students are wrangling their way through a painful disciplinary system: mind-numbing standardized tests; teacher expectations which are too high, too low or (because the affective labour will wear you out) non-existent; endless valorisation of “hard-work” in place of critical thought, contemplation, going slow…
I tell her that many grown Americans are guilty of worse, recalling NPR’s recurring failure to recognise the limits of the term ‘minority’. Reporting on demographic change in the U.S one presenter said: “the projections show that by 2040 minorities will be in the majority” (wut). Back to her high schoolers, she tells me: “Of course, we don’t take marks off for that kind of thing”. I want to say but that is the thing, a big chunk of the whole entire point(!). But British training never fails: I cough, wave my hands, gag on the words.
- hoodbitchwithintelligence reblogged this from sebastiankmtco
- blaqueerpozitivity reblogged this from sebastiankmtco
- boygeorgemichaelbluth likes this
- sebastiankmtco reblogged this from derica
- somewhatgettingoverit likes this
- derica likes this
- mostlytalk reblogged this from derica and added:
- dark-pool-of-the-mind likes this
- akilamantado likes this
- sleepyeyedbitch likes this
- b4-me likes this
- gravalicious reblogged this from derica
- notgoing likes this
- notalexus likes this
- bestsparkler likes this
- ahnka likes this
- buddhaspalm said: I’m so interested in the development of a more globalised language/understanding of & around blackness. After some lite living in the UK it seems to me that many (white) Brits and Americans think racial progress is them never hearing about it.
- randomberlinchick said: Precisely why I left the US and moved to the UK when I wanted to do doctoral research on cultural identity and music in Germany. I didn’t want to be limited to US-based racial discourse. It hardly explains the US much less anyplace else.
- emmadelosnardos said: this is fascinating. do you live/study/work in nyc? i really agree with what you say about american insularity and how the US experience is too often cut off from other histories (I studied Latin American colonial history at one point).
- randomberlinchick likes this
- buddhaspalm likes this
- emmadelosnardos likes this
- dylandigits likes this
- dreyfuszoller likes this
- othernotebooksareavailable likes this
- derica posted this